BothSides

← All issues

International

The war in Ukraine

Should the United States keep backing Ukraine until Russia accepts fair terms, or press for a settlement now?

Information checked against its sources on October 13, 2026.

First drafted by Claude, an AI model. Edited and reviewed for balance by Leonard Dalenberg. How this site is written

Side A

Keep backing Ukraine until Russia accepts fair terms.

Supporters of continued aid say Russia invaded a sovereign neighbor and must not be rewarded for it. In their view a settlement that hands Moscow land it has failed to take by force would invite the next invasion, in Ukraine or elsewhere, and American support is what keeps a fair peace possible.

  • Russia is the obstacle to peace. Moscow still demands that Ukraine give up the part of Donetsk it holds and renounce NATO membership. Ukraine has offered to stop the fighting along the current line.
  • Russia is paying heavily for very little. Over the past year Russian forces gained about 0.4 percent of Ukraine's territory, at a cost analysts estimate in the hundreds of thousands of casualties.
  • The burden on Americans has fallen. Europe now provides most of the aid, and much of what Ukraine receives from the United States is bought by allies from American manufacturers.
  • Credibility is at stake. Russia pledged in 1994 to respect Ukraine's borders. If aggression succeeds here, supporters argue, allies and rivals in Asia will draw their own conclusions about American commitments.

On this view the path to peace is more pressure on Russia, through weapons and sanctions, until it negotiates in earnest.

Side B

Press for a settlement now, even an imperfect one.

Supporters of an early settlement say the war has become a stalemate that neither side can win on the battlefield. In their view every month of delay costs thousands of lives without changing the outcome, and the United States has more pressing needs for its money and weapons.

  • The line has barely moved. Russia holds about a fifth of Ukraine. After more than four years, no one has shown a realistic way for Ukraine to retake it by force.
  • The human cost keeps rising. Analysts estimate Ukraine's military casualties at more than half a million. Ukraine is the smaller country and can least afford a long war of attrition.
  • American resources are finite. The United States committed well over $100 billion in the war's first three years, and its weapons stockpiles are now strained by the war with Iran.
  • The risk is real. Russia has the world's largest nuclear arsenal. Supporters of a settlement argue that Europe's security should be Europe's responsibility first.

On this view wars like this end at the negotiating table, and the terms available now, with security guarantees for Ukraine, are likely better than those available later.

Other views

Factual review

What is established

  • Russia seized Crimea in 2014 and launched a full invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022.
  • Russia controls about 19 percent of Ukraine, counting land taken before 2022. In the year to September 29, 2026, its net gain was about 805 square miles, roughly 0.4 percent of the country.1
  • The United States was the largest single donor from 2022 through 2024, at roughly $135 billion. New U.S. aid has nearly stopped since 2025, and European governments have increased theirs.2
  • Allies now buy American weapons for Ukraine through a NATO program; NATO's military chair put the total delivered at $10 billion as of October 2026.3
  • There is no ceasefire. U.S., Ukrainian and European officials met in Miami on October 9, 2026, and three-way talks with Russia were under discussion for later in the month. On October 13, Reuters reported that U.S. envoys had told Ukrainian officials Russia's president was not prepared to negotiate an end to the war, and that Washington hoped a deal for Russian diesel exports would help restart those talks. The president announced a halt to strikes on energy sites on October 11; neither government confirmed it, and Russia struck Ukrainian energy targets the next day.4
  • Russia demands that Ukraine withdraw from all of Donetsk and give up its bid to join NATO. Ukraine proposes halting at the current line.5

What is disputed

  • Casualties. A leading U.S. research center estimates about 1.4 million Russian and 525,000 to 625,000 Ukrainian military casualties through June 2026, killed, wounded and missing together. Neither government publishes reliable figures, and other estimates differ. The United Nations counts more than 17,000 civilians killed in Ukraine.1
  • Is Washington pressing Kyiv to give up land? President Zelensky says U.S. security guarantees were tied to a Ukrainian withdrawal from Donbas. The White House denies it.5
  • Would Russia stop? One side reads Moscow's demands as proof it wants all of Ukraine. The other believes a settlement on territory and neutrality would hold. This is a judgment about intentions and cannot be checked.
  • Whose side is time on? Russian advances have slowed and its losses are high, but Russia is larger and Ukraine is short of soldiers. Analysts disagree about who weakens first.
  • What Americans want. In a late-2025 Reagan Institute survey, 64 percent supported sending U.S. weapons to Ukraine, including 59 percent of Republicans and 75 percent of Democrats. Gallup found in August 2025 that 52 percent favored helping Ukraine regain its territory even if the war lasts longer, and 45 percent favored ending it quickly. No 2026 poll on aid was found.6

Where it comes down to values

  • Justice or peace. Is it better to end the killing on unjust terms, or to keep fighting for terms that are fair?
  • Whose decision. How much say should the United States have over what Ukrainians are willing to give up or to endure?
  • America's stake. Is the security of Eastern Europe a core American interest or someone else's problem?
  • Principle or prudence. How much risk and cost is the rule against changing borders by force worth?

Sources

  1. Russia Matters (Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center), “The Russia-Ukraine War Report Card, Sept. 30, 2026,” using DeepState mapping data, a July 2026 CSIS casualty estimate and UN civilian figures. russiamatters.org
  2. Kiel Institute, Ukraine Support Tracker, 2025 and 2026 updates. ifw-kiel.de
  3. Ukrinform, “Dragone: Ukraine has received $10B worth of U.S. weapons through PURL,” Oct. 2026. ukrinform.net
  4. France 24, “US, Europe and Ukraine hold ‘constructive discussions’ on joint plan to end war,” Oct. 10, 2026. france24.com Reuters via Cyprus Mail, “US says Russian diesel deal could revive Ukraine peace talks,” Oct. 13, 2026. cyprus-mail.com
  5. PBS NewsHour, “Zelenskyy proposes compromise for Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine.” pbs.org U.S. News/Reuters, Jan. 27, 2026, on security guarantees and Donbas. usnews.com
  6. Ronald Reagan Institute, 2025 Reagan National Defense Survey (Oct. 23–Nov. 3, 2025). reaganfoundation.org Gallup survey of Aug. 1–15, 2025, as reported by Euromaidan Press. euromaidanpress.com
  7. Memorandum on Security Assurances in connection with Ukraine's accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Budapest, Dec. 5, 1994. United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 3007, no. 52241. treaties.un.org

← All issues

Reader comments

No comments yet. Respond to either side, add a view the page missed, or challenge a fact with a source.

Commenting is open to account holders. Accounts are approved by the editor, and comments appear under your real name.